Austin Dog Bite Laws

While some states allow dog owners to be held legally liable for any dog bites or injury, Texas state law observes the “one-bite” rule: for a dog owner to be legally responsible for an attack committed by their dog, it must be proved that the owner knew that the animal had a tendency to be dangerous. Still, Texas allows local jurisdictions to adopt other laws regarding aggressive dogs.

In Austin dog bite cases, for example, an attorney has to utilize an understanding of both Texas dog bite laws and Austin’s specific dog regulations to establish whether an owner has adhered to legal requirements. Among other things, this involves pinpointing any deviations from relevant regulations that may highlight owner negligence, which is important to establishing liability. The following sections outline the sections of Austin’s Animal Regulations, which are relevant to dog bites.

  1. Provoked Biting – Refers to biting incidents where the dog was taunted, defending itself, a human, property, or another animal, or was reacting to pain or fear. The term provoked biting also applies to situations when a dog accidentally bites while engaged in play.
  2. Unprovoked Biting – Describes biting incidents that occur without any evident provocation. These incidents typically occur during ordinary interactions with the dog,
  3. Restraint – Defined as keeping the dog within a secure enclosure or under direct physical control when outside such an enclosure.
  4. Severe Injury – Involves injuries from dog bites that result in significant physical harm. These injuries include broken bones, disfiguring lacerations requiring multiple sutures, or injuries that result in nerve damage.

These definitions are key when it comes to a dog bite lawsuit. For example, determining whether a bite was provoked or unprovoked can significantly affect the case, potentially influencing the owner’s liability and the nature of any legal actions taken. Similarly, the severity of the injury can dictate the urgency and type of medical treatment required, as well as the potential for substantial legal claims. Restraint measures taken by the owner can also play into how responsibility is assessed in the case.

General Restrictions in Austin’s Dog Regulations and their Application in Dog Bite Cases

1. Running at Large Prohibited (§ 3-2-1)

Restriction: Dogs are not allowed to run at large.

Application: Allowing a dog to roam freely increases the risk of bites or attacks, particularly if the dog is unsupervised. In a dog bite case, evidence that a dog was running at large could strongly impact the owner’s liability.

2. Noisy Animals (§ 3-2-2)

Restriction: Dogs must not cause frequent or prolonged noise disturbances.

Application: Chronic noise may indicate distress, poor training, or lack of control, potentially contributing to aggressive behaviors. This factor could be considered when assessing an owner’s negligence in a bite incident.

3. Training and Control of Animals (§ 3-2-8)

Restriction: Prohibits training or controlling animals with harsh or harmful implements.

Application: Use of prohibited training methods can contribute to a dog’s aggression, becoming a critical factor in legal cases involving dog bites.

4. Enclosure Required (§ 3-2-11) & Enclosure for Dogs (§ 3-2-13)

Restriction: Enclosures must satisfy certain criteria, including being securely built, appropriately sized, and sanitary. There are additional requirements for outdoor enclosures intended to keep multiple dogs, including those dictating size and distance from other residences.

Application: Proper enclosures prevent dogs from escaping and potentially biting someone. Non-compliance can be used to demonstrate owner negligence in maintaining safe conditions.

5. Vaccination Required for Dogs (§ 3-3-2)

Restriction: Mandatory rabies vaccination for dogs.

Application: Compliance with vaccination laws is crucial. In the event of a bite, a vaccinated dog poses less of a health risk, which can mitigate some concerns in legal proceedings.

Vicious Dogs (§ 3-4-7)


Under Austin’s ordinance § 3-4-7, a dog is classified as “vicious” if it is found running at large and engages in severe aggressive behaviors, specifically:

  1. Killing another domestic animal: This classification applies if a dog kills another domestic pet, fowl, or livestock. Importantly, the animal killed must not have been violating confinement or control regulations at the time of the attack.
  2. Causing serious injury: A dog is also deemed vicious if it seriously injures another animal to the extent that the animal’s life is endangered or it suffers significant permanent impairment.  Veterinarian confirmation via an affidavit to the health authority is required, stating the severity of the injury or impairment.

These classifications impact the owner’s liability in dog bite cases. A dog labeled as vicious, for example, results in more severe legal consequences, influencing compensation claims and legal strategies. This precise categorization aids law firms like Loewy Law Firm in preparing and arguing cases effectively, ensuring clients receive appropriate legal advice and representation.

Detailed Overview of Austin’s Vicious Dog Ordinance (§ 3-4-7)

Austin’s ordinance outlines specific responsibilities and legal processes for owners of dogs deemed vicious. Here’s a breakdown:

Owner Responsibilities

  • Secure Restraint: Owners must keep vicious dogs either securely leashed or in a confined enclosure.
  • Notification to Boarding Facilities: Owners are required to inform any boarding facility that the dog has been declared vicious.
  • Current Rabies Vaccination: Within 30 days of the owner being put on notice that the dog is vicious, they must submit proof to the Health Department that the dog has an up-to-date rabies vaccination.

Reporting and Investigation

  • Mandatory Reporting: Incidents involving a vicious dog must be reported to the Health Authority.
  • Investigation Process: The Health Authority investigates the incident, including collecting evidence and witness statements, and determines if the dog meets the criteria of “vicious”.
  • Right to Appeal: Owners can appeal the vicious designation within 15 days of notification.
  • Notice of Appeal: File a notice of appeal with the municipal court.
    • Attach a copy of the Health Authority’s determination.
    • Serve a copy of the appeal to the Health Authority.

Compliance and Penalties

  • Compliance Requirements: Post-designation, the owner must:
    • Provide proof of the dog’s rabies vaccination.
    • Implant a microchip in the dog.
  • Enforcement Actions: Non-compliance can result in citations from the Health Authority.

In dog bite cases involving a dog classified as “vicious”, understanding the owner’s compliance with these strict regulations can significantly affect the case. If a dog deemed vicious is involved in an incident, the owner’s adherence to the ordinance’s requirements—such as secure restraint and mandatory reporting—could be pivotal in determining liability and the severity of legal actions against them.

Austin Dog Bite Laws: Understanding Guard Dog Regulations and Their Application in Dog Bite Cases

Definitions (§ 3-4-41)

Commercial Property: Specifies areas where guard dogs are primarily used, including buildings or lands zoned for business or commercial activities, and vehicles used for business purposes.

Guard Dog: Defined as a dog specifically employed to protect commercial properties.

  • Application: In dog bite cases, the terms ‘Commercial Property’ and ‘Guard Dog’ help determine where the laws apply. These definitions clarify that guard dog laws are for dogs that protect business areas. For example, if a guard dog leaves a business site and bites someone on a public sidewalk, this might increase the owner’s legal responsibility, highlighting that the dog wasn’t confined to the business area as required.

Exception (§ 3-4-42)

Regulations regarding guard dogs do not extend to those used at private residences unless the residence is located within commercially zoned property.

Regulatory Compliance (§ 3-4-43, § 3-4-44)

Compliance with Title Requirements: Mandates that guard dog owners adhere to specific regulations to ensure public safety.

  • Application: Non-compliance can be used as evidence of negligence in dog bite cases, affecting legal outcomes.

Health Authority Oversight: Describes the Health Authority’s role in setting safety rules and inspecting guard dogs and properties to ensure compliance.

  • Application: Establishes a framework for accountability; failure to meet these standards can lead to claims of negligence.

Safety and Containment Requirements (§ 3-4-45)

Secure Housing and Restraining: Guard dogs must be housed within anti-escape structures, either fenced securely or in a building designed to prevent escape.

  • Application: This is key in dog bite cases as the adequacy of the containment can directly impact the owner’s liability if a dog escapes and injures someone.

Locking Mechanisms: The gates or entrances to any area containing the guard dog must remain locked unless the dog is under direct human control.

  • Application: Ensuring gates are locked prevents unintended release of the dog, reducing the risk of bites outside the designated containment area, which can be pivotal in liability assessments.

Perimeter Security: The area outside buildings patrolled by guard dogs must include barriers like a tall fence or wall, and windows must be strong enough to prevent a guard dog from breaking through.

  • Application: Proper perimeter security is vital; breaches can lead to incidents where the public might be endangered, increasing potential legal consequences for the owner.

Signage and Visibility: Owners must post warning signs around the property no further than 200 feet apart to alert the public about the presence of a guard dog.

  • Application: Proper signage helps manage public interactions, reducing the owner’s liability by demonstrating efforts to warn and protect the public.

Transportation Safety: When transporting a guard dog, specific regulations must be followed to secure the dog safely.

  • Application: Compliance with transportation rules is essential, as accidents involving poorly secured guard dogs can lead to severe liability issues.

Dog Handler Requirements (§ 3-4-46)

Requirement: A handler must be physically present when guard dogs are used on temporary sites or commercial properties that do not meet specific criteria.

  • Application: This ensures there is immediate control and supervision over the guard dog, potentially mitigating the risk and severity of bite incidents by maintaining direct oversight, especially crucial in unfamiliar or unsecured environments.

Permit Requirements for Guard Dogs (§ 3-4-61 to § 3-4-66)

Permit Acquisition and Display: An owner must secure a permit for the presence of guard dogs and display this permit on the property. Permit applications require that owners disclose specific information about the guard dogs and the nature of the business.

  • Application: Displaying a valid permit can be pivotal in dog bite litigation, serving as proof of compliance with local regulations which can influence liability determinations if a bite occurs.

Guard Dog Identification Tags (§ 3-4-67)

Requirement: All guard dogs must wear identification tags issued by the health authority.

  • Application: Identification tags are critical for promptly linking a guard dog back to its owner and verifying its registration status, which is essential in resolving issues of responsibility and liability quickly after an incident.

The details of Austin’s dog bite laws, from the classification of vicious dogs to the responsibilities of guard dog owners, play a critical role in determining liability in dog bite cases. These regulations are designed to establish clear standards for dog owner accountability and also protect the public.

The team at Loewy Law Firm is experienced in handling dog bite cases in Austin and can help ensure that you receive the proper compensation for your injuries. If you or someone you know has been affected by a dog bite, don’t hesitate to reach out for the guidance and support you need during this challenging time.

How an Austin Dog Bite Lawyer Can Help If You’ve Been Attacked

The dog bite attorneys at The Loewy Law Firm are here to help you if a dog has bitten you in Austin or the surrounding areas. We understand just how painful your injuries and this experience can be, and we are here to help you get answers, justice, and fair compensation. Let us help you navigate the often-complicated waters of a dog bite claim, and let us help you get the money you need to rebuild your life and move on from the attack. Call us at (512) 280-0800, fill out a contact form, or chat with us live on our site and schedule a free consultation with us right away.

Additional References: